Follow Up Monitoring For Impairment Decisions 2017

Purpose

Follow Up monitoring at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance

Outcome

Impairment decisions on selected streams and lakes for Wisconsin's Impared Waters list, 303(d).

Related Reports

Run Project Summary Report
View Umbrella-Projects
View Sub-Projects
View Related-Projects

TMDL/303d Projects
Identify Impaired Waters
FollowUp_2017
2017
Active
 
Reports and Documents
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
This project will evaluate water quality improvements made in the Waupaca/Tomorrow River Watershed from Best Management Practices installed in the watershed from 1996 through 2002 as part of the Waupaca River Priority Watershed Project. Water Action Volunteers’ volunteers were selected to monitor total phosphorus levels at ten of the sites included in this project. Many of these sites are also monitored for nitrogen and nitrates by the volunteers.
The Kickapoo Valley Stewardship Network worked with the WAV Program to fund active volunteers concerned about elevated total phosphorus levels in the region’s streams. The volunteers use a combination of VSN and WAV resources to submit monthly samples to the Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
The Kickapoo Valley Stewardship Network worked with the WAV Program to fund active volunteers concerned about elevated total phosphorus levels in the region’s streams. The volunteers use a combination of VSN and WAV resources to submit monthly samples to the Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Monroe County is creating a Land Use Plan for the Tri Creeks Watershed Property. This project will provide data to support their plan and fill data gaps. This project will also allow us to assess sites (Moore Creek and Morris Creek and it's groundwater) to support data collection for natural community/designated uses verifications and assess stream health. Camille Bruhn will work with the field crew (Jake Ring, Mycal Raleigh, etc.) to complete the water quality, fish, habitat, and macroinvertebrate monitoring. The monitoring will occur in FY17 and FY18.
Data collected at this site is for the Lake Tomah Monitoring Project.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
The Kickapoo Valley Stewardship Network worked with the WAV Program to fund active volunteers concerned about elevated total phosphorus levels in the region’s streams. The volunteers use a combination of VSN and WAV resources to submit monthly samples to the Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene.
The Kickapoo Valley Stewardship Network worked with the WAV Program to fund active volunteers concerned about elevated total phosphorus levels in the region’s streams. The volunteers use a combination of VSN and WAV resources to submit monthly samples to the Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene.
The Kickapoo Valley Stewardship Network worked with the WAV Program to fund active volunteers concerned about elevated total phosphorus levels in the region’s streams. The volunteers use a combination of VSN and WAV resources to submit monthly samples to the Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Many of Wisconsin’s water quality standards require multiple visits to make an impairment decision. Every year, several streams sites are monitored, and the field data collected during each visit is used to “flag” problem waters. The following year, follow up monitoring is conducted at sites where our data suggests that there might be an impairment, but we do not have the minimum data requirements to make an impairment decisions based on WisCALM guidance.
Monitoring at this site is funded by grant obtained by the monitoring group.
Monitoring at this site is funded by grant obtained by the monitoring group.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Employees from Grande Cheese Company’s Juda and Brownsville Offices are working together with DNR biologists and Water Action Volunteers to monitor several sites in the Sugar River and Rock River Watersheds. The volunteers will be collecting total phosphorus samples and submitting to the State Lab of Hygiene.
Document describing DNR Water Quality Follow Up Monitoring - Protocols and Study Design