Photo by Emmet Judziewicz
State Rank: S2 Global Rank: G3 what are these ranks?
The Great Lakes beach community occurs at the interface of land and water along the margins of Lakes Michigan and Superior, often in association with sparsely vegetated, semi-stabilized dune systems. Great Lakes beaches are extremely dynamic features, strongly influenced by water level changes and storm events. The lower beach is continually impacted by waves, the middle beach supports a dynamic plant community affected by wave action only during storms, and the upper beach, affected by wind-blown sand, wave spray, and only the most severe storms, supports a relatively diverse assemblage of plants.
The beach flora is typically sparse due to the scouring action of waves and ice. However, following several years of low water with few major storm events, the vegetation of the upper beach zone can become quite dense. Floristic composition can be an odd mix that includes globally rare endemics, as well as widespread weedy species adapted to quickly colonizing disturbed areas swept bare of competing vegetation. Exposed shorelines may be entirely unvegetated. Plants endemic to the shores of the Great Lakes, such as seaside spurge (Euphorbia polygonifolia) and American sea-rocket (Cakile edentula), are characteristic of some of the Lake Michigan beaches, especially during low water periods. Native associates may include silverweed (Potentilla anserina), Baltic rush (Juncus balticus), and water horehound (Lycopus americanus). The beaches on Lake Superior are for the most part unvegetated but are important foraging, resting, and breeding areas for both migrating and resident birds.
The following Species of Greatest Conservation Need are listed according to their level of association with the Great Lakes Beach natural community type, based on the findings in Wisconsin's 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.
Scores: 3 = high association, 2 = moderate association, and 1 = low association. See the key to association scores for complete definitions.
Ants, wasps, and bees | Score | |
---|---|---|
Confusing Bumble Bee | Bombus perplexus | 1 |
Beetles | Score | |
---|---|---|
Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle | Cicindela hirticollis rhodensis | 3 |
Ghost Tiger Beetle | Ellipsoptera lepida | 1 |
Birds | Score | |
---|---|---|
Caspian Tern | Hydroprogne caspia | 3 |
Common Tern | Sterna hirundo | 3 |
Piping Plover | Charadrius melodus | 3 |
Rufa Red Knot | Calidris canutus rufa | 3 |
Peregrine Falcon | Falco peregrinus | 1 |
Purple Martin | Progne subis | 1 |
Dragonflies and damselflies | Score | |
---|---|---|
Alkali Bluet | Enallagma clausum | 1 |
Grasshoppers and allies | Score | |
---|---|---|
Lake Huron Locust | Trimerotropis huroniana | 3 |
Seaside Grasshopper | Trimerotropis maritima | 3 |
Blue-legged Grasshopper | Melanoplus flavidus | 2 |
Bruner's Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus bruneri | 2 |
Clear-winged Grasshopper | Camnula pellucida | 2 |
Delicate Meadow Katydid | Orchelimum delicatum | 1 |
Forest Locust | Melanoplus islandicus | 1 |
Huckleberry Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus fasciatus | 1 |
Scudder's Short-winged Grasshopper | Melanoplus scudderi | 1 |
Speckled Rangeland Grasshopper | Arphia conspersa | 1 |
Stone's Locust | Melanoplus stonei | 1 |
Please see Section 2. Approach and Methods of the Wildlife Action Plan to learn how this information was developed.
The Natural Heritage Inventory has developed scores indicating the degree to which each of Wisconsin's rare plant species is associated with a particular natural community or ecological landscape. This information is similar to that found in the Wildlife Action Plan for animals. As this is a work in progress, we welcome your suggestions and feedback.
Scientific Name | Common Name | Score |
---|---|---|
Cakile edentula var. lacustris | American Sea-rocket | 3 |
Carex garberi | Elk Sedge | 1 |
Carex merritt-fernaldii | Fernald's Sedge | 1 |
Elymus lanceolatus ssp. psammophilus | Thickspike | 3 |
Euphorbia polygonifolia | Seaside Spurge | 3 |
Festuca occidentalis | Western Fescue | 2 |
Parnassia parviflora | Small-flowered Grass-of-Parnassus | 2 |
Salix pellita | Satiny Willow | 3 |
Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia | Tea-leaved Willow | 1 |
Solidago simplex var. gillmanii | Dune Goldenrod | 3 |
Tanacetum bipinnatum ssp. huronense | Lake Huron Tansy | 3 |
The following Ecological Landscapes have the best opportunities to manage for Great Lakes Beach, based on the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook.
Ecological Landscape | Opportunity |
---|---|
Central Lake Michigan Coastal | Major |
Northern Lake Michigan Coastal | Major |
Superior Coastal Plain | Major |
Southern Lake Michigan Coastal | Present |
Major (3 on map)
A major opportunity for sustaining the natural community in the Ecological Landscape exists, either because many significant occurrences of the natural community have been recorded in the landscape or major restoration activities are likely to be successful maintaining the community's composition, structure, and ecological function over a longer period of time.
Important (2 on map)
Although the natural community does not occur extensively or commonly in the Ecological Landscape, one to several occurrences do occur and are important in sustaining the community in the state. In some cases, important opportunities may exist because the natural community may be restricted to just one or a few Ecological Landscapes within the state and there may be a lack of opportunities elsewhere.
Present (1 on map)
The natural community occurs in the Ecological Landscape, but better management opportunities appear to exist in other parts of the state.
Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the WWAP because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.
Threats/issues and conservations actions for natural communities
The following are additional considerations for Great Lakes Beach in Ecological Landscapes with opportunities for protection, restoration, and/or management. For more information, see the Wildlife Action Plan.
Point Beach State Forest protects 6 miles of beaches and dunes, which are associated with a complex system of ridges and swales that parallel the Lake Michigan shoreline. Harrington Beach and Kohler-Andrae State Parks protect additional undeveloped shoreline habitats but receive very heavy human visitation during the summer months.
Several examples occur along the west shore of Green Bay, including at Seagull Bar and Peshtigo Harbor. Whitefish Dunes, Rock Island, and Newport State Parks contain important examples of this habitat. Significant populations of rare plants are known from several of these sites.
Most beaches on Lake Superior are associated with Great Lakes coastal landforms such as barrier spits, baymouth bars, tombolos, and cuspate forelands. The Apostle Islands National Lakeshore protects several miles of undeveloped beach. At several locations small beaches arch between rocky headlands. The beaches of the Apostle Islands and Chequamegon Bay are important staging areas for migratory birds, and provide critical nesting habitat for shorebirds. Wilderness designation, currently under consideration at the National Lakeshore, could add further protection to several of these sites. Bark Bay Slough, Port Wing Boreal Forest, and Lost Creek Bog are State Natural Areas managed by the WDNR that feature beaches protected by sand bars. Significant beaches occur on tribal lands under the stewardship of the Bad River and Red Cliff bands of Lake Superior Ojibwa. A more disturbed but extensive area of Great Lakes beach occurs at Wisconsin Point, a coastal barrier spit at the mouth of the St. Louis River. Additional beach areas lie at scattered spots along the southern Lake Superior coast from Wisconsin Point to the Montreal River, nearly 150 miles to the east.
Click to view a larger version. Please considering donating your photos to the Natural Heritage Conservation Program for educational uses. Photo use
Note: photos are provided to illustrate various examples of natural community types. A single photograph cannot represent the range of variability inherent in a given community type. Some of these photos explicitly illustrate unusual and distinctive community variants. The community photo galleries are a work in progress that we will expand and improve in the future.