Photo by Emmet Judziewicz
State Rank: S3 Global Rank: G3? what are these ranks?
Northern dry forests occur on nutrient-poor sites with excessively drained sandy or rocky soils. The primary historic disturbance regime was catastrophic fire at intervals of ten to one hundred years. Dominant trees of mature stands include jack pine (Pinus banksiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa), and northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis). Large acreages of this forest type were cut and burned during the logging of the late-19th and early-20th century. Much of this land was then colonized by paper birch (Betula papyrifera) and/or trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) or converted to pine plantations starting in the 1920s.
Today's forests have a greatly reduced component of pines, and a greater extent of aspen, red maple, and oaks compared to historic conditions. Common understory shrubs are hazelnuts (Corylus spp.), early blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), and brambles (Rubus spp.). Common herbs include bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), starflower (Trientalis borealis), barren-strawberry (Waldsteinia fragarioides), cow-wheat (Melampyrum lineare), trailing arbutus (Epigaea repens), and members of the shinleaf family (Chimaphila umbellata, Pyrola spp.). Vast acreages of cutover land were also planted to pine or naturally succeeded to densely stocked dry forests.
Factors affecting the current abundance and condition of northern dry forests include fire suppression and the spread of invasive species. On some sites (e.g., on richer sites where better growth is expected) silvicultural practices may maintain or even increase certain cover types such as red pine. For other cover types such as jack pine, the management efforts may be to eliminate interior gaps and edges and strive to make tree spacing and size as uniform as possible, in part to lessen the probability of severe budworm damage. Such practices reduce or remove habitat for native species dependent on aspects of the patchy nature of northern Wisconsin's dry ecosystems.
Northern dry forests most commonly occur on large, continuous glacial outwash or lake plain landforms. On these extensive dry plains, historic fires were large and intense, and were less likely to be halted by wetlands, hills, or mesic soils, creating ideal conditions for establishment of northern dry forests.
Three different seral stages are described for northern dry forest, based on the progressive stages of forest regeneration following harvesting or a major natural disturbance, from young forest to mid-seral to the attainment of reference conditions as seen in a mature stand. Stands with more than 50 percent aspen by basal area fall into the aspen-birch habitat type. For stands dominated by planted conifers, refer to the conifer plantation.
In describing these stages, it is recognized that they exist and persist on the landscape due to a marked range of conditions depending on conservation or production goals and the nature and intensity of management. Even the most basic actions of promoting natural regeneration carry the weight of this reality---in an area where the purpose is strictly forest production, the decision to harvest and replant may be relatively straightforward, but on a site managed all or in part for ecological values the prescription and stand rotation is more complex.
Some of the important site characteristics that may determine how SGCN utilize this seral stage include pocket barrens, frost pockets, or other non-forested openings that provide important habitat, the landscape mosaic of barrens and forest across landscape, structural attributes, and diversity of other woody species and herbaceous plants.
The following Species of Greatest Conservation Need are listed according to their level of association with the Northern Dry Forest natural community type, based on the findings in Wisconsin's 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.
Scores: 3 = high association, 2 = moderate association, and 1 = low association. See the key to association scores for complete definitions.
Amphibians | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mink Frog | Lithobates septentrionalis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Ants, wasps, and bees | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee | Bombus affinis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Confusing Bumble Bee | Bombus perplexus | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Yellowbanded Bumble Bee | Bombus terricola | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sanderson's Bumble Bee | Bombus sandersoni | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Indiscriminate Cuckoo Bumble Bee | Bombus insularis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Aquatic and terrestrial snails | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Black Striate | Striatura ferrea | 1 | 1 |
Beetles | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Barrens Tiger Beetle | Cicindela patruela patruela | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Ghost Tiger Beetle | Ellipsoptera lepida | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A Leaf Beetle | Distigmoptera impennata | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A Leaf Beetle | Glyptina leptosoma | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A Pear-shaped Weevil | Fallapion impeditum | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A Leaf Beetle | Pachybrachis luridus | 1 | 1 |
Birds | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Goshawk | Accipiter gentilis | 1 | 1 | |
Spruce Grouse | Falcipennis canadensis | 1 | 1 | |
American Woodcock | Scolopax minor | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Long-eared Owl | Asio otus | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Common Nighthawk | Chordeiles minor | 1 | ||
Eastern Whip-poor-will | Antrostomus vociferus | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Red-headed Woodpecker | Melanerpes erythrocephalus | 1 | 1 | |
Black-backed Woodpecker | Picoides arcticus | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Olive-sided Flycatcher | Contopus cooperi | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Acadian Flycatcher | Empidonax virescens | 1 | ||
Least Flycatcher | Empidonax minimus | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Swainson's Thrush | Catharus ustulatus | 2 | 1 | |
Golden-winged Warbler | Vermivora chrysoptera | 1 | 2 | |
Kirtland's Warbler | Setophaga kirtlandii | 1 | 3 | |
Connecticut Warbler | Oporornis agilis | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Evening Grosbeak | Coccothraustes vespertinus | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Butterflies and moths | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Blue | Lycaeides idas | 2 | ||
Karner Blue | Lycaeides melissa samuelis | 1 | 1 | |
Chryxus Arctic | Oeneis chryxus | 1 | 1 | |
Owl-eyed Bird Dropping Moth | Cerma cora | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Doll's Merolonche | Acronicta dolli | 1 | 1 | |
Phlox Moth | Schinia indiana | 1 | ||
Bina Flower Moth | Schinia bina | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Grasshoppers and allies | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Blue-legged Grasshopper | Melanoplus flavidus | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Grizzly Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus punctulatus | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Stone's Locust | Melanoplus stonei | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Bruner's Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus bruneri | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Huckleberry Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus fasciatus | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Forest Locust | Melanoplus islandicus | 3 | 3 | 3 |
A Spur-throat Grasshopper | Melanoplus foedus | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Rocky Mountain Sprinkled Locust | Chloealtis abdominalis | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Crackling Forest Grasshopper | Trimerotropis verruculata | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Spotted-winged Grasshopper | Orphulella pelidna | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Speckled Rangeland Grasshopper | Arphia conspersa | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Clear-winged Grasshopper | Camnula pellucida | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Ash-brown Grasshopper | Trachyrhachys kiowa | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Mermiria Grasshopper | Mermiria bivittata | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Leafhoppers and true bugs | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A Leafhopper | Laevicephalus vannus | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Mammals | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Little Brown Bat | Myotis lucifugus | 1 | 1 | |
Northern Long-eared Bat | Myotis septentrionalis | 2 | 1 | |
Silver-haired Bat | Lasionycteris noctivagans | 2 | 1 | |
Northern Flying Squirrel | Glaucomys sabrinus | 2 | 1 | |
Woodland Jumping Mouse | Napaeozapus insignis | 1 | 1 | 1 |
American Marten | Martes americana | 1 |
Reptiles | Late | Mid | Young | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wood Turtle | Glyptemys insculpta | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Blanding's Turtle | Emydoidea blandingii | 2 | ||
Slender Glass Lizard | Ophisaurus attenuatus | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Prairie Skink | Plestiodon septentrionalis | 1 | 2 | |
Gophersnake | Pituophis catenifer | 1 | 2 | |
Eastern Massasauga | Sistrurus catenatus | 1 |
Please see Section 2. Approach and Methods of the Wildlife Action Plan to learn how this information was developed.
The Natural Heritage Inventory has developed scores indicating the degree to which each of Wisconsin's rare plant species is associated with a particular natural community or ecological landscape. This information is similar to that found in the Wildlife Action Plan for animals. As this is a work in progress, we welcome your suggestions and feedback.
Scientific Name | Common Name | Late | Mid | Young |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asclepias ovalifolia | Dwarf Milkweed | 1 | 1 | |
Boechera missouriensis | Missouri Rock-cress | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Carex merritt-fernaldii | Fernald's Sedge | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Leucophysalis grandiflora | Large-flowered Ground-cherry | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Piptatheropsis canadensis | Canada Mountain Ricegrass | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Platanthera hookeri | Hooker's Orchid | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Pseudognaphalium micradenium | Catfoot | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Vaccinium cespitosum | Dwarf Bilberry | 3 | 3 | 3 |
The following Ecological Landscapes have the best opportunities to manage for Northern Dry Forest, based on the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook.
Ecological Landscape | Opportunity |
---|---|
Northeast Sands | Major |
Northwest Sands | Major |
Central Sand Plains | Important |
Northern Highland | Important |
Northern Lake Michigan Coastal | Important |
Superior Coastal Plain | Important |
Central Sand Hills | Present |
North Central Forest | Present |
Northwest Lowlands | Present |
Major (3 on map)
A major opportunity for sustaining the natural community in the Ecological Landscape exists, either because many significant occurrences of the natural community have been recorded in the landscape or major restoration activities are likely to be successful maintaining the community's composition, structure, and ecological function over a longer period of time.
Important (2 on map)
Although the natural community does not occur extensively or commonly in the Ecological Landscape, one to several occurrences do occur and are important in sustaining the community in the state. In some cases, important opportunities may exist because the natural community may be restricted to just one or a few Ecological Landscapes within the state and there may be a lack of opportunities elsewhere.
Present (1 on map)
The natural community occurs in the Ecological Landscape, but better management opportunities appear to exist in other parts of the state.
Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the WWAP because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.
Threats/issues and conservations actions for natural communities
The following are additional considerations for Northern Dry Forest in Ecological Landscapes with opportunities for protection, restoration, and/or management. For more information, see the Wildlife Action Plan.
This community type is well represented, occurring mainly in Adams, Juneau, southeastern Wood, and southwestern Portage counties. Fragmentation is an issue in the Ecological Landscape, especially related to residential development and roads. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the county forests, Quincy Bluff (Adams County), Robinson Creek and the Black River State Forest (both in Jackson County). Connectivity with other forested areas in this community type should be maintained and enhanced where possible, and jack pine should be maintained on appropriate sites since it is declining statewide.
Northern dry forests are well represented, mainly in northern Marinette and southern Florence counties. Fragmentation is less of an issue since population and road densities are low. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the county forests, Pine and Popple Wild Rivers property, and the Peshtigo River State Forest. Connectivity with other forested areas should be maintained and enhanced where possible.
Northern dry forests are of very limited extent in this Ecological Landscape, mainly occurring as patches in the southern portion. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the Vilas and Oneida county forests and the Northern Highland-American Legion State Forest. Fragmentation is less of an issue in this Ecological Landscape. Invasives are becoming a problem (e.g., Asian honeysuckle); there is still potential for controlling invasives if effective measures are taken in the near future.
There are a few occurrences of northern dry forest in this Ecological Landscape, generally on the west side of Green Bay near the Peshtigo River. The best sites are under private ownership. Opportunities for management or restoration are limited.
Northern dry forests are well represented in this Ecological Landscape, where outwash sand plains are more extensive and connected than in any other part of the state. Only in the far northern portion of the Ecological Landscape are other community types more dominant. Fragmentation is less of an issue since population and road densities are relatively low. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the Polk, Burnett, Washburn, Douglas, and Bayfield County Forests; Governor Knowles State Forest and Crex Meadows (both in Burnett County); Brule River State Forest (Douglas County); and the Washburn District of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest (Bayfield County). Connectivity with other forested areas in this community type should be maintained and enhanced where possible, and jack pine should be maintained on appropriate sites since it is declining statewide.
There are a few occurrences of northern dry forest in this Ecological Landscape, mostly on sand spits on the Apostle Islands, especially on Long Island. Opportunities for management or restoration are limited.
Click to view a larger version. Please considering donating your photos to the Natural Heritage Conservation Program for educational uses. Photo use
Note: photos are provided to illustrate various examples of natural community types. A single photograph cannot represent the range of variability inherent in a given community type. Some of these photos explicitly illustrate unusual and distinctive community variants. The community photo galleries are a work in progress that we will expand and improve in the future.