LRP - Licenses

LRP - Regulations

LRP - Permits

Recreation - Statewide

Recreation - Trapping

Recreation - Fishing

Recreation - Hunting

Env. Protection - Management

Env. Protection - Emergency

Env. Protection - Resources

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your contact information below.



 
Rare animals
Find rare and non-game animals.
Rare plants
Learn about plants on the Natural Heritage Working List.
Rare lichens
Discover Wisconsin's lichens.
Natural communities
Explore Wisconsin's natural communities.
Other features
Discover unique resources.
Contact information
For information on Wisconsin's natural communities, contact:
Ryan O'Connor
Natural Heritage Inventory Ecologist
608-266-7714

Northern Tamarack Swamp

State Rank: S3     Global Rank: G4   what are these ranks?

Definition

Detailed Community Description from Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin

General natural community overview

Also known as tamarack poor swamp, these weakly to moderately minerotrophic conifer swamps are dominated by a broken to closed canopy of tamarack (Larix laricina) and a frequently dense understory of speckled alder (Alnus incana), mountain holly (Ilex mucronata), winterberry (Ilex verticillata), black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa), and bog birch (Betula pumila). The understory is more diverse than in black spruce swamps and may include more nutrient-demanding species such as black ash (Fraxinus nigra). The bryophytes include many genera other than Sphagnum. Stands with spring seepage sometimes have marsh-marigold (Caltha palustris) and skunk-cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) as common understory inhabitants.

Defining Characteristics and Similar Communities

Northern tamarack swamps are characterized by their moderately minerotrophic soil, canopy dominated by tamarack, and prevalence of tall shrubs, usually with at least 5% cover, and often up to 25% cover or more. While taramack may co-dominate (or even be locally dominant in) black spruce swamps, that community has more acidic soil, a sparse layer of tall shrubs (5% cover or less), and a more continuous carpet of Sphagnum moss. While Sphagnum moss occurs in northern tamarack swamps, it usually forms a discontinuous layer and is concentrated on hummocks elevated above the moderately minerotrophic groundwater or surface water. Northern tamarack swamps sometimes grade into alder thickets, which are generally classified as having fewer trees (less than 25% cover, usually much less) and higher coverage of tall shrubs (50% cover or more). Northern tamarack swamps also occur adjacent to central poor fens, which are also generally classified as having no more than 25% cover of trees.

Northern tamarack swamps are similar to southern tamarack swamps, but the latter tend to be more minerotrophic with a greater prevalence of calciphiles such as poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix). Although the two communities generally occur in the northern and southern part of the state, respectively, they do overlap somewhat in the Central Sands region. Although the region is located within and south of Wisconsin's climatic tension zone, northern tamarack swamps are common in the ancient lakebed of Glacial Lake Wisconsin where flat, acid peatlands are underlain by nutrient-poor sands. Just to the east in the hills above the ancient lakeplain, southern tamarack swamps predominate due to the more minerotrophic groundwater seeping through the calcareous glacial deposits. Thus, nutrient status and the relative abundance of calciphitic species is more useful than latitude in differentiating the two communities.

Rare animals

Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

The following Species of Greatest Conservation Need are listed according to their level of association with the Northern Tamarack Swamp natural community type, based on the findings in Wisconsin's 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.

Scores: 3 = high association, 2 = moderate association, and 1 = low association. See the key to association scores for complete definitions.

AmphibiansScore
Four-toed SalamanderHemidactylium scutatum2
Pickerel FrogLithobates palustris2
Mink FrogLithobates septentrionalis1

Ants, wasps, and beesScore
Frigid Bumble BeeBombus frigidus1

BeetlesScore
A Predaceous Diving BeetleHydroporus morio2
A Predaceous Diving BeetleHydrocolus persimilis2

BirdsScore
Black-backed WoodpeckerPicoides arcticus3
Olive-sided FlycatcherContopus cooperi3
Spruce GrouseFalcipennis canadensis3
Boreal ChickadeePoecile hudsonicus2
Golden-winged WarblerVermivora chrysoptera2
Gray JayPerisoreus canadensis2
Swainson's ThrushCatharus ustulatus2
American WoodcockScolopax minor1
Connecticut WarblerOporornis agilis1

Butterflies and mothsScore
Arctic FritillaryBoloria chariclea2

Dragonflies and damselfliesScore
Forcipate EmeraldSomatochlora forcipata2
Zigzag DarnerAeshna sitchensis2
Sphagnum SpriteNehalennia gracilis1
Subarctic DarnerAeshna subarctica1
Swamp DarnerEpiaeschna heros1

Grasshoppers and alliesScore
Crackling Forest GrasshopperTrimerotropis verruculata1
Grizzly Spur-throat GrasshopperMelanoplus punctulatus1
Spotted-winged GrasshopperOrphulella pelidna1

Leafhoppers and true bugsScore
A Broad-shouldered Water StriderMicrovelia albonotata2

MammalsScore
Little Brown BatMyotis lucifugus3
Northern Flying SquirrelGlaucomys sabrinus3
Water ShrewSorex palustris3
Silver-haired BatLasionycteris noctivagans2
American MartenMartes americana1
Northern Long-eared BatMyotis septentrionalis1
Woodland Jumping MouseNapaeozapus insignis1

ReptilesScore
Wood TurtleGlyptemys insculpta2
Eastern RibbonsnakeThamnophis sauritus1

Please see Section 2. Approach and Methods of the Wildlife Action Plan to learn how this information was developed.

Rare plants

The Natural Heritage Inventory has developed scores indicating the degree to which each of Wisconsin's rare plant species is associated with a particular natural community or ecological landscape. This information is similar to that found in the Wildlife Action Plan for animals. As this is a work in progress, we welcome your suggestions and feedback.

Scores: 3 = "significantly associated," 2 = "moderately associated," and 1 = "minimally associated."
Scientific Name Common Name Score
Amerorchis rotundifolia Round-leaved Orchis 2
Lonicera involucrata Fly Honeysuckle 3
Polemonium occidentale ssp. lacustre Western Jacob's Ladder 3
Pyrola minor Lesser Wintergreen 3
Vaccinium vitis-idaea Mountain Cranberry 3
Valeriana uliginosa Marsh Valerian 3

Landscapes

The following Ecological Landscapes have the best opportunities to manage for Northern Tamarack Swamp, based on the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook.


Map of the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin.


Major (3 on map)
A major opportunity for sustaining the natural community in the Ecological Landscape exists, either because many significant occurrences of the natural community have been recorded in the landscape or major restoration activities are likely to be successful maintaining the community's composition, structure, and ecological function over a longer period of time.

Important (2 on map)
Although the natural community does not occur extensively or commonly in the Ecological Landscape, one to several occurrences do occur and are important in sustaining the community in the state. In some cases, important opportunities may exist because the natural community may be restricted to just one or a few Ecological Landscapes within the state and there may be a lack of opportunities elsewhere.

Present (1 on map)
The natural community occurs in the Ecological Landscape, but better management opportunities appear to exist in other parts of the state.

Threats/Actions

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

What are conservation actions?

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the WWAP because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.

Threats/issues and conservations actions for natural communities

Photos


Northern Tamarack Swamp Photos

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack(poor) swamp and muskeg, Langlade County.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack (poor) swamp, Langlade County.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack (poor) swamp with muskeg with black spruce, Langlade County.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack is a widespread tree in northern Wisconsin and our only deciduous conifer. It often grows with black spruce on the wettest sites that will support trees, but does best under slightly less acid conditions than the bog-loving spruce. Madeline Island, Ashland County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack Swamp, "Sultz Swamp," Bayfield County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Northern Tamarack Swamp Photo

Tamarack swamp surrounded by cedar and black ash, Odanah Swamp, Ashland County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Note: photos are provided to illustrate various examples of natural community types. A single photograph cannot represent the range of variability inherent in a given community type. Some of these photos explicitly illustrate unusual and distinctive community variants. The community photo galleries are a work in progress that we will expand and improve in the future.

Last revised: Monday, June 04, 2018