LRP - Licenses

LRP - Regulations

LRP - Permits

Recreation - Statewide

Recreation - Trapping

Recreation - Fishing

Recreation - Hunting

Env. Protection - Management

Env. Protection - Emergency

Env. Protection - Resources

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your contact information below.



 
Rare animals
Find rare and non-game animals.
Rare plants
Learn about plants on the Natural Heritage Working List.
Rare lichens
Discover Wisconsin's lichens.
Natural communities
Explore Wisconsin's natural communities.
Other features
Discover unique resources.
Contact information
For information on Wisconsin's natural communities, contact:
Ryan O'Connor
Natural Heritage Inventory Assistant Ecologist
608-266-7714

Northern Dry Forest

State Rank: S3     Global Rank: G3?   what are these ranks?

Definition

General natural community overview

Counties shaded blue have documented occurrences for Northern Dry Forest in the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory database.

Northern Dry Forest occurs on nutrient-poor sites with excessively drained sandy or rocky soils. The primary historic disturbance regime was catastrophic fire at intervals of ten to one hundred years. Dominant trees of mature stands include jack pine (Pinus banksiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa), and northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis). Large acreages of this forest type were cut and burned during the catastrophic logging of the late 19th and early 20th century. Much of this land was then colonized by paper birch (Betula papyrifera) and/or trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides), or converted to pine plantations starting in the 1920s.

Today's forests have a greatly reduced component of pines, and a greater extent of aspen, red maple, and oaks as compared to historic conditions. Common understory shrubs are hazelnuts (Corylus spp.), early blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), and brambles (Rubus spp.); common herbs include bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), starflower (Trientalis borealis), barren-strawberry (Waldsteinia fragarioides), cow-wheat (Melampyrum lineare), trailing arbutus (Epigaea repens), and members of the shinleaf family (Chimaphila umbellata, Pyrola spp.). Vast acreages of cutover land were also planted to pine, or naturally succeeded to densely stocked dry forests.

Factors affecting the current abundance and condition of Northern Dry Forest include fire suppression and the spread of invasive species. On some sites (e.g., on richer sites where better growth is expected) silvicultural practices may maintain or even increase certain cover types such as red pine. For other cover types such as jack pine, the management efforts may be to eliminate interior gaps and edges, and strive to make tree spacing and size as uniform as possible, in part to lessen the probability of severe budworm damage. Such practices reduce or remove habitat for native species dependent on aspects of the patchy nature of northern Wisconsin's dry ecosystems.

Northern Dry Forest community types most commonly occur on large, continuous glacial outwash or lake plain landforms. On these extensive dry plains, historic fires were large and intense, and were less likely to be halted by wetlands, hills or mesic soils, creating ideal conditions for establishment of Northern Dry Forest.

Three different seral stages are described for Northern Dry Forest, based on the progressive stages of forest regeneration following harvesting or a major natural disturbance, from young forest to mid-seral to the attainment of reference conditions as seen in a mature stand. Stands with more than 50 percent aspen by basal area fall into the Aspen-Birch habitat type. For stands dominated by planted conifers, refer to the Conifer Plantation type.

  • Northern Dry Forest --late seral: Late-seral (may also be referred to as Old or Old-Growth) Northern Dry Forest are dominated by trees 40 feet tall (approximately 5 to 10 inches dbh) or more and are dominated by jack pine (Pinus banksiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa), white and northern pin oak (Quercus alba and Q. ellipsoidalis), as well as pockets of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Tall shrub (e.g. hazelnut (Corylus spp. And serviceberry (Amelanchier spp.)) density is variable, ranging from sparse to dense thickets, but is typically greater in more mature stands, which provides important habitat for some Species of Greatest Conservation Need. In addition, forest grasses, sedges, forbs, and mosses predominate in the groundlayer. Snag density is at its highest relative to other seral stages, providing habitat for woodpeckers and cavity-nesting birds. Stands may include those on the older end of those managed as part of a shifting barrens mosaic as well as those managed for old-growth characteristics.
  • Northern Dry Forest --mid-seral: Mid-seral Northern Dry Forests are dominated by trees 16 to 40 feet in height (approximately 3 to 5 inches dbh). Like other seral stages of dry forests, species are primarily jack pine (Pinus banksiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa) and northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis), but can also include components of white pine (Pinus strobus), red maple (Acer rubrum), aspen (Populus spp.) and birch (Betula spp.). Depending on stand origin, scattered grassy or shrubby openings may be present, providing important habitat components for Species of Greatest Conservation Need such as whip-poor-will and common nighthawk. However, in this seral stage, herbaceous vegetation shifts significantly away from barrens associates and toward forest grasses, sedges, and forbs. Structural complexity is slightly higher than in younger forests, with multiple size classes of trees developing, particularly where both oaks and pines are present, despite still being even aged.
  • Northern Dry Forest --young seral: Young-seral Northern Dry Forests are dominated by trees 16 feet tall or less (approximately 0-3 inches dbh). Species are primarily jack pine (Pinus banksiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa) and northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis), but can also include red maple (Acer rubrum), aspen (Populus spp.) and birch (Betula spp.). Stands typically originate from stand-replacing events such as clear-cutting or fire, but can also arise from mechanical soil scarification. They are mostly even-aged stands with few or no snags and little coarse woody debris. Structurally, young Northern Dry Forests may have similarities to Pine Barrens, with scattered openings with native grasses, scattered wildflowers, and patches of hazelnuts (Corylus spp.), dewberry (Rubus spp.), and blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) providing habitat for SGCN and other wildlife. However, tree density is higher and openings smaller than in true barrens, and ground flora is highly variable depending on how the forest was established.

In describing these stages, it is recognized that they exist and persist on the landscape due to a marked range of conditions depending on conservation or production goals and the nature and intensity of management. Even the most basic actions of promoting natural regeneration carry the weight of this reality---in an area where the purpose is strictly forest production, the decision to rotate and replant may be relatively straightforward, but on a site managed all or in part for ecological values the prescription and stand rotation is more complex.

Some of the important site characteristics that may determine how Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) utilize this seral stage include: pocket barrens, frost pockets, or other non-forested openings that provide important habitat for SGCN, the landscape mosaic of barrens and forest across landscape, structural attributes, and diversity of other woody species and herbaceous plants.

Rare animals

Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

The following Species of Greatest Conservation Need are listed according to their level of association with the Northern Dry Forest natural community type, based on the findings in Wisconsin's 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.

Scores: 3 = high association, 2 = moderate association, and 1 = low association. See the key to association scores for complete definitions.

AmphibiansLateMidYoung
Mink FrogLithobates septentrionalis111

Ants, wasps, and beesLateMidYoung
Rusty-patched Bumble BeeBombus affinis111
Confusing Bumble BeeBombus perplexus111
Yellowbanded Bumble BeeBombus terricola111
Sanderson's Bumble BeeBombus sandersoni111
Indiscriminate Cuckoo Bumble BeeBombus insularis111

Aquatic and terrestrial snailsLateMidYoung
Black StriateStriatura ferrea11

BeetlesLateMidYoung
Northern Barrens Tiger BeetleCicindela patruela patruela333
Ghost Tiger BeetleEllipsoptera lepida111
A Leaf BeetleDistigmoptera impennata111
A Leaf BeetleGlyptina leptosoma111
A Pear-shaped WeevilFallapion impeditum111
A Leaf BeetlePachybrachis luridus11

BirdsLateMidYoung
Northern GoshawkAccipiter gentilis11
Spruce GrouseFalcipennis canadensis11
American WoodcockScolopax minor123
Long-eared OwlAsio otus122
Common NighthawkChordeiles minor1
Eastern Whip-poor-willAntrostomus vociferus222
Red-headed WoodpeckerMelanerpes erythrocephalus11
Black-backed WoodpeckerPicoides arcticus222
Olive-sided FlycatcherContopus cooperi111
Acadian FlycatcherEmpidonax virescens1
Least FlycatcherEmpidonax minimus121
Swainson's ThrushCatharus ustulatus21
Golden-winged WarblerVermivora chrysoptera12
Kirtland's WarblerSetophaga kirtlandii13
Connecticut WarblerOporornis agilis211
Evening GrosbeakCoccothraustes vespertinus321

Butterflies and mothsLateMidYoung
Northern BlueLycaeides idas2
Karner BlueLycaeides melissa samuelis11
Chryxus ArcticOeneis chryxus11
Owl-eyed Bird Dropping MothCerma cora111
Doll's MeroloncheAcronicta dolli11
Phlox MothSchinia indiana1
Bina Flower MothSchinia bina112

Grasshoppers and alliesLateMidYoung
Blue-legged GrasshopperMelanoplus flavidus222
Grizzly Spur-throat GrasshopperMelanoplus punctulatus111
Stone's LocustMelanoplus stonei222
Bruner's Spur-throat GrasshopperMelanoplus bruneri222
Huckleberry Spur-throat GrasshopperMelanoplus fasciatus222
Forest LocustMelanoplus islandicus333
A Spur-throat GrasshopperMelanoplus foedus111
Rocky Mountain Sprinkled LocustChloealtis abdominalis112
Crackling Forest GrasshopperTrimerotropis verruculata211
Spotted-winged GrasshopperOrphulella pelidna111
Speckled Rangeland GrasshopperArphia conspersa222
Clear-winged GrasshopperCamnula pellucida222
Ash-brown GrasshopperTrachyrhachys kiowa111
Mermiria GrasshopperMermiria bivittata112

Leafhoppers and true bugsLateMidYoung
A LeafhopperLaevicephalus vannus111

MammalsLateMidYoung
Little Brown BatMyotis lucifugus11
Northern Long-eared BatMyotis septentrionalis21
Silver-haired BatLasionycteris noctivagans21
Northern Flying SquirrelGlaucomys sabrinus21
Woodland Jumping MouseNapaeozapus insignis111
American MartenMartes americana1

ReptilesLateMidYoung
Wood TurtleGlyptemys insculpta233
Blanding's TurtleEmydoidea blandingii2
Slender Glass LizardOphisaurus attenuatus123
Prairie SkinkPlestiodon septentrionalis12
GophersnakePituophis catenifer12
Eastern MassasaugaSistrurus catenatus1

Please see Section 2. Approach and Methods of the Wildlife Action Plan to learn how this information was developed.

Rare plants

The Natural Heritage Inventory has developed scores indicating the degree to which each of Wisconsin's rare plant species is associated with a particular natural community or ecological landscape. This information is similar to that found in the Wildlife Action Plan for animals. As this is a work in progress, we welcome your suggestions and feedback.

Scores: 3 = "significantly associated," 2 = "moderately associated," and 1 = "minimally associated."
Scientific Name Common Name Late Mid Young
Asclepias ovalifolia Dwarf Milkweed 1 1
Boechera missouriensis Missouri Rock-cress 2 2 2
Carex merritt-fernaldii Fernald's Sedge 3 3 3
Leucophysalis grandiflora Large-flowered Ground-cherry 2 2 2
Piptatheropsis canadensis Canada Mountain Ricegrass 2 2 2
Platanthera hookeri Hooker's Orchid 1 1 1
Pseudognaphalium micradenium Catfoot 1 1 1
Vaccinium cespitosum Dwarf Bilberry 3 3 3

Landscapes

The following Ecological Landscapes have the best opportunities to manage for Northern Dry Forest, based on the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook.


Map of the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin.


Major (3 on map)
A major opportunity for sustaining the natural community in the Ecological Landscape exists, either because many significant occurrences of the natural community have been recorded in the landscape or major restoration activities are likely to be successful maintaining the community's composition, structure, and ecological function over a longer period of time.

Important (2 on map)
Although the natural community does not occur extensively or commonly in the Ecological Landscape, one to several occurrences do occur and are important in sustaining the community in the state. In some cases, important opportunities may exist because the natural community may be restricted to just one or a few Ecological Landscapes within the state and there may be a lack of opportunities elsewhere.

Present (1 on map)
The natural community occurs in the Ecological Landscape, but better management opportunities appear to exist in other parts of the state.

Threats/Actions

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

What are conservation actions?

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the WWAP because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.

Threats/issues and conservations actions for natural communities

Considerations

The following are additional considerations for Northern Dry Forest in Ecological Landscapes with opportunities for protection, restoration, and/or management. For more information, see the Wildlife Action Plan.

Central Sand Plains

This community type is well represented, occurring mainly in Adams, Juneau, southeastern Wood, and southwestern Portage counties. Fragmentation is an issue in the Ecological Landscape, especially related to residential development and roads. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the county forests, Quincy Bluff (Adams County), Robinson Creek and the Black River State Forest (both in Jackson County). Connectivity with other forested areas in this community type should be maintained and enhanced where possible, and jack pine should be maintained on appropriate sites since it is declining statewide.

Northeast Sands

Northern dry forests are well represented, mainly in northern Marinette and southern Florence counties. Fragmentation is less of an issue since population and road densities are low. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the county forests, Pine and Popple Wild Rivers property, and the Peshtigo River State Forest. Connectivity with other forested areas should be maintained and enhanced where possible.

Northern Highland

Northern dry forests are of very limited extent in this Ecological Landscape, mainly occurring as patches in the southern portion. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the Vilas and Oneida county forests and the Northern Highland-American Legion State Forest. Fragmentation is less of an issue in this Ecological Landscape. Invasives are becoming a problem (e.g., Asian honeysuckle); there is still potential for controlling invasives if effective measures are taken in the near future.

Northern Lake Michigan Coastal

There are a few occurrences of northern dry forest in this Ecological Landscape, generally on the west side of Green Bay near the Peshtigo River. The best sites are under private ownership. Opportunities for management or restoration are limited.

Northwest Sands

Northern dry forests are well represented in this Ecological Landscape, where outwash sand plains are more extensive and connected than in any other part of the state. Only in the far northern portion of the Ecological Landscape are other community types more dominant. Fragmentation is less of an issue since population and road densities are relatively low. The best opportunities for restoration and alternative management techniques are on the Polk, Burnett, Washburn, Douglas, and Bayfield County Forests; Governor Knowles State Forest and Crex Meadows (both in Burnett County); Brule River State Forest (Douglas County); and the Washburn District of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest (Bayfield County). Connectivity with other forested areas in this community type should be maintained and enhanced where possible, and jack pine should be maintained on appropriate sites since it is declining statewide.

Superior Coastal Plain

There are a few occurrences of northern dry forest in this Ecological Landscape, mostly on sand spits on the Apostle Islands, especially on Long Island. Opportunities for management or restoration are limited.

Photos


Northern Dry Forest Photos

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Natural red pine (Pinus resinosa) dominated northern dry forest on Presque Isle Bay side of the tombolo Significant erosion is caused by a campground situated on this side of the tombolo. Stockton Island, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. Bayfield Cou.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Glacial kettle lakes embedded within extensive conifer-hardwood forests are common and characteristic features of the Northern Highland Ecological Landscape.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Natural red pine stand on Stockton Island. APIS - NVC plot (CarolPlot) 09.

Photo by Christina Isenring.

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Natural red pine stand on Stockton Island.

Photo by Christina Isenring.

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Northern Dry Forest of Red Pine with Black Spruce on Stockton Island Tombolo, Bayfield County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Northern Dry Forest Photo

Northern dry forest of Hill's oak, white oak - north end of Quincy Bluff, Adams County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Note: photos are provided to illustrate various examples of natural community types. A single photograph cannot represent the range of variability inherent in a given community type. Some of these photos explicitly illustrate unusual and distinctive community variants. The community photo galleries are a work in progress that we will expand and improve in the future.

Last revised: Tuesday, November 28, 2017