LRP - Licenses

LRP - Regulations

LRP - Permits

Recreation - Statewide

Recreation - Trapping

Recreation - Fishing

Recreation - Hunting

Env. Protection - Management

Env. Protection - Emergency

Env. Protection - Resources

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your contact information below.



 
Rare animals
Find rare and non-game animals.
Rare plants
Learn about plants on the Natural Heritage Working List.
Rare lichens
Discover Wisconsin's lichens.
Natural communities
Explore Wisconsin's natural communities.
Other features
Discover unique resources.
Contact information
For information on Wisconsin's natural communities, contact:
Ryan O'Connor
Natural Heritage Inventory Assistant Ecologist
608-266-7714

Emergent Marsh

State Rank: S4     Global Rank: G4   what are these ranks?

Definition

General natural community overview

Counties shaded blue have documented occurrences for Emergent Marsh in the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory database.

Emergent Marsh is dominated by robust emergent macrophytes, in pure stands of single species or in various mixtures. Dominants include cattails (Typha spp.), bulrushes (particularly Scirpus acutus, S. fluviatilis, and S. validus), bur-reeds (Sparganium spp.), giant reed (Phragmites australis), pickerel-weed (Pontederia cordata), water- plantains (Alisma spp.), arrowheads (Sagittaria spp.), the larger species of spike-rush (such as Eleocharis smallii), and wild rice (Zizania spp.). Emergent Marsh can occur in a wide variety of hydrologic settings, including inland lake, Great Lakes, riverine and estuarine complexes.

Aquatic plants, including both emergent and submergent aquatic vegetation, form the foundation of healthy and flourishing aquatic ecosystems - both within lakes and rivers and on the shores and wetlands around them. They not only protect water quality, but they also produce life-giving oxygen. Aquatic plants are a lake's own filtering system, helping to clarify the water by absorbing nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen that could stimulate algal blooms. Plant beds stabilize soft lake and river bottoms and reduce shoreline erosion by reducing the effect of waves and current.

Aquatic plants also serve as spawning habitat for fish and amphibians, as shelter for various life stages of a variety of species, and as nesting habitat for birds. Plant beds support populations of aquatic insects that serve as a food base for other species. Seeds and other plant parts provide vital nutrition to a number of waterfowl and other bird species. Healthy, native aquatic plant communities also help prevent the establishment of invasive exotic plants like Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum).

Rare animals

Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

The following Species of Greatest Conservation Need are listed according to their level of association with the Emergent Marsh natural community type, based on the findings in Wisconsin's 2015 Wildlife Action Plan.

Scores: 3 = significantly associated, 2 = moderately associated, and 1 = minimally associated.

AmphibiansScore
Blanchard's Cricket FrogAcris blanchardi3
Four-toed SalamanderHemidactylium scutatum3
Mink FrogLithobates septentrionalis3
Pickerel FrogLithobates palustris3

Aquatic and terrestrial snailsScore
Wing SnaggletoothGastrocopta procera1

BeetlesScore
A Predaceous Diving BeetleThermonectus basilaris2
A Predaceous Diving BeetleColymbetes exaratus2
A Predaceous Diving BeetleIlybius angustior2
A Predaceous Diving BeetleAgabus discolor2
A Predaceous Diving BeetleHygrotus marklini2
Sylvan Hygrotus Diving BeetleHygrotus sylvanus2
A Minute Moss BeetleHydraena angulicollis1
A Predaceous Diving BeetleAgabus aeruginosus1
A Predaceous Diving BeetleHygrotus farctus1

BirdsScore
American Black DuckAnas rubripes3
Black TernChlidonias niger3
Forster's TernSterna forsteri3
Great EgretArdea alba3
King RailRallus elegans3
Least BitternIxobrychus exilis3
Red-necked GrebePodiceps grisegena3
Whooping CraneGrus americana3
Yellow-headed BlackbirdXanthocephalus xanthocephalus3
American BitternBotaurus lentiginosus2
Black-crowned Night-HeronNycticorax nycticorax2
Common TernSterna hirundo2
Purple MartinProgne subis2
Rufa Red KnotCalidris canutus rufa2
Rusty BlackbirdEuphagus carolinus2
Yellow-crowned Night-HeronNyctanassa violacea2
Black-necked StiltHimantopus mexicanus1
Short-eared OwlAsio flammeus1
Wilson's PhalaropePhalaropus tricolor1
Yellow RailCoturnicops noveboracensis1

Butterflies and mothsScore
Midwestern Fen BuckmothHemileuca nevadensis ssp. 31
Swamp MetalmarkCalephelis muticum1

Dragonflies and damselfliesScore
Spangled SkimmerLibellula cyanea3
Spatterdock DarnerRhionaeschna mutata3
Painted SkimmerLibellula semifasciata2
Slaty SkimmerLibellula incesta2
Hine's EmeraldSomatochlora hineana1
Lilypad ForktailIschnura kellicotti1
Mottled DarnerAeshna clepsydra1
Swamp DarnerEpiaeschna heros1

Grasshoppers and alliesScore
Bog ConeheadNeoconocephalus lyristes1
Spotted-winged GrasshopperOrphulella pelidna1

Leafhoppers and true bugsScore
A LeafhopperLimotettix pseudosphagneticus2

MammalsScore
Big Brown BatEptesicus fuscus2
Little Brown BatMyotis lucifugus2
Northern Long-eared BatMyotis septentrionalis2
Silver-haired BatLasionycteris noctivagans2
Eastern PipistrellePerimyotis subflavus1

ReptilesScore
Blanding's TurtleEmydoidea blandingii3
Butler's GartersnakeThamnophis butleri3
Eastern MassasaugaSistrurus catenatus3
Plains GartersnakeThamnophis radix3
QueensnakeRegina septemvittata3
Western RibbonsnakeThamnophis proximus2
Eastern RibbonsnakeThamnophis sauritus1

Please see Section 2. Approach and Methods of the Wildlife Action Plan to learn how this information was developed.

Rare plants

The Natural Heritage Inventory has developed scores indicating the degree to which each of Wisconsin's rare plant species is associated with a particular natural community or ecological landscape. This information is similar to that found in the Wildlife Action Plan for animals. As this is a work in progress, we welcome your suggestions and feedback.

Scores: 3 = "significantly associated," 2 = "moderately associated," and 1 = "minimally associated."
Scientific Name Common Name Score
Armoracia lacustris Lake Cress 2
Carex lenticularis Shore Sedge 2
Catabrosa aquatica Brook Grass 2
Didiplis diandra Water-purslane 2
Elatine triandra Longstem Water-wort 2
Eleocharis equisetoides Horsetail Spike-rush 3
Eleocharis flavescens var. olivacea Capitate Spike-rush 2
Eleocharis quadrangulata Square-stem Spike-rush 3
Eleocharis robbinsii Robbins' Spike-rush 2
Epilobium strictum Downy Willow-herb 2
Galium palustre Marsh Bedstraw 2
Myosotis laxa Small Forget-me-not 2
Nuphar advena Yellow Water Lily 3
Nuphar microphylla Small Yellow Pond Lily 3
Potamogeton oakesianus Oakes' Pondweed 3
Ranunculus cymbalaria Seaside Crowfoot 2
Ranunculus gmelinii Small Yellow Water Crowfoot 2
Sagittaria montevidensis ssp. calycina Long-lobed Arrowhead 3
Schoenoplectus heterochaetus Slender Bulrush 3
Schoenoplectus torreyi Torrey's Bulrush 2
Scirpus pallidus Pale Bulrush 3

Landscapes

The following Ecological Landscapes have the best opportunities to manage for Emergent Marsh, based on the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook.


Map of the Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin.


Major (3 on map)
A major opportunity for sustaining the natural community in the Ecological Landscape exists, either because many significant occurrences of the natural community have been recorded in the landscape or major restoration activities are likely to be successful maintaining the community's composition, structure, and ecological function over a longer period of time.

Important (2 on map)
Although the natural community does not occur extensively or commonly in the Ecological Landscape, one to several occurrences do occur and are important in sustaining the community in the state. In some cases, important opportunities may exist because the natural community may be restricted to just one or a few Ecological Landscapes within the state and there may be a lack of opportunities elsewhere.

Present (1 on map)
The natural community occurs in the Ecological Landscape, but better management opportunities appear to exist in other parts of the state.

Threats/Actions

Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan graphic

What are conservation actions?

Conservation actions respond to issues or threats, which adversely affect species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) or their habitats. Besides actions such as restoring wetlands or planting resilient tree species in northern communities, research, surveys and monitoring are also among conservation actions described in the WWAP because lack of information can threaten our ability to successfully preserve and care for natural resources.

Threats/issues and conservations actions for natural communities

Considerations

The following are additional considerations for Emergent Marsh in Ecological Landscapes with opportunities for protection, restoration, and/or management. For more information, see the Wildlife Action Plan.

Central Lake Michigan Coastal

Invasive plants (e.g., Phragmites, reed canary grass, purple loosestrife) can replace native plants and affect aquatic communities. Continuing effects of past management (e.g., filling marshes) are evident. Grass Lake (Calument County) supports a good emergent aquatic community. Kewaunee River Marsh (Kewaunee County) and Little Tail Point (Brown County) are examples of other emergent communities in public ownership.

Central Sand Hills

Invasive plants (e.g., reed canary grass, giant reed and purple loosestrife) can replace native plants and affect aquatic communities. Effects of past management (e.g., filling marshes) are very evident in this Ecological Landscape. Grassy Lake Wildlife Area (Columbia County) and Lawrence Creek State Natural Area (Marquette County) are examples of high quality emergent aquatic communities here.

Central Sand Plains

Many streams have been hydrologically altered and marshes drained here for various agricultural purposes. Research may be necessary to determine whether emergent communities can be restored under this scenario of flow alteration. Windy Run and Marsh (Clark County) and Monroe County Flowage in the Meadow Valley Wildlife Area are examples of this community here.

Forest Transition

Invasive plants (e.g., purple loosestrife) can replace native plants. Dams have raised water levels to eliminate this community type in some sites but also create marsh habitat in other locations. Drainage for agricultural use reduced marsh habitat. Pope Lake (Waushara County) and Tenmile Creek Marsh (Rusk County) typify this community here.

North Central Forest

Invasive plants (e.g., purple loosestrife) can replace native plants. Dams have raised water levels and affected this community type in some sites but created marsh habitat in locations further upstream. Totagatic Lake (Bayfield County) is a quality site.

Northeast Sands

Development on popular lakes may pose a threat to this community. Utricularia Bay on Warrington Lake (Oconto County) is an excellent example of this community type here, and several others are protected on the Menominee reservation. The ability of lake classification to protect remaining populations of emergent vegetation on lakes subject to housing development and recreational use should be investigated.

Northern Highland

This Ecological Landscape contains some unique and sensitive marsh types. Large areas in public ownership help to ensure the viability of this community here. Frog Lake and Pine State Natural Area (Iron County) showcase high quality examples of this type.

Northern Lake Michigan Coastal

Significant alterations to wetlands have impacted this community here, but some restoration attempts have restored this community in wildlife areas along the west shore of Green Bay, to the benefit of fish such as northern pike. Mink River Estuary and the Dunes Lake area (both in Door County) contain intact examples of emergent marsh.

Northwest Lowlands

Most problems due to lakeshore development and recreational use are associated with the larger developed lakes. Invasive plants (e.g., purple loosestrife) have replaced native plants in some areas. Pockets of marsh exist along lake and stream shores, as well as state-managed wildlife flowages (Douglas County).

Northwest Sands

Cranberry operations, though currently limited here, have the potential to decrease the amount of wetland habitat, alter natural communities, and affect local hydrology and water quality. An appreciable number of lakes still support viable emergent aquatic communities here. Some of the larger marshes in this Ecological Landscape occur along impounded portions of rivers or small streams. Good examples of the emergent marsh community include the Gordon Flowage on the St. Croix River (Burnett County) and some of the managed flowages at Crex Meadows (Wood County).

Southeast Glacial Plains

Invasive plants (e.g., Phragmites, reed canary grass, purple loosestrife, flowering rush, glossy buckthorn, narrow-leaved cattail) can replace native plants and affect aquatic communities. Many marshes are becoming highly dominated by cattails. Botulism is a concern when oxygen content is low. Remaining lead shot in hard-bottomed water bodies still occasionally results in poisoning. Carp are a threat, and so are effects of carp control efforts. There are continuing effects of past management (e.g., draining and filling marshes). This Ecological Landscape formerly included many marshes. It is among the best Ecological Landscapes regarding the potential for restoring and managing this type. Existing sites include Horicon Marsh (Dodge County) (and the satellite Fox River Crane Marsh), Rush Lake and Fox River marshes (Winnebago County), many Wildlife Areas, and a number of Waterfowl Production Areas. Restoration areas include the Glacial HRA (Fond du Lac County) (using the wetland reserve program). Formerly drained wetlands (e.g., muck farms) have been recently purchased and may be converted and managed as marsh. More of this community type should be protected by working with conservation managers and interest groups. Watersheds should be managed to control runoff from surrounding agricultural areas that may contribute nutrients and sediment. Drawdowns for shorebird management are effective, but the needs of amphibians and reptiles should be considered; consider timing drawdowns to reduce the threat of botulism. These sites should be monitored to determine whether management is maintaining native diversity and the effects of non-native cattails should be researched.

Southern Lake Michigan Coastal

Increasing population levels due to proximity to the expanding Milwaukee metropolitan area continue to drive rapidly increasing development and land use conversion. Land use planning that is not comprehensive and does not emphasize conservation considerations can lead to development in locations that limit options for restoring and managing this community. Continuing effects of past management (e.g., filling marshes) are evident on the landscape, and pose barriers to restoring this community here. Past drainage for agricultural use reduced marsh habitat. Agricultural activities in close proximity to water bodies have led to sedimentation, eutrophication, and increased runoff, causing detrimental changes to community structure. Runoff is likely increasing due to development and increases in impervious surface area. Invasive plants (e.g., Phragmites, reed canary grass, purple loosestrife) can replace native plants and affect aquatic communities. Invasive animals (e.g., carp, rusty crayfish) are also a problem for this community type. Use of existing land use plans that call for conservation actions should be encouraged. Watersheds should be managed to control runoff that may contribute nutrients and sediment. Brighton Marsh and Woodland (Kenosha County) and Mission Hills Wetlands (Milwaukee County) are good examples of this community in southeast Wisconsin.

Superior Coastal Plain

Disturbance from recreational powerboats coming into rivers from Lake Superior can cause sedimentation and physical damage to aquatic plants. Eutrophication (in St. Louis River estuary, Port Wing) can cause detrimental changes to community structure. Invasive plants (e.g., purple loosestrife, Phragmites, reed canary grass) have replaced native plants. Soil erosion and sedimentation from uplands into water bodies is a particular threat in this Ecological Landscape due to the erodible soils. Agriculture, impermeable surfaces, and lack of conifers contribute to peakflow episodes during spring snowmelt. Unsustainable forest management practices can result in soil erosion and water quality issues. This type is primarily associated with coastal embayments on Lake Superior. Inland lakes are scarce in this Ecological Landscape. Uplands within the watershed should be reforested, restoring conifers where possible. Best Management Practices and other sustainable forest management practices should be used to limit detrimental soil and water effects. Adaptive management techniques should be used to restore structure and composition. More information on land use in the watershed should be gathered and effects on peakflows into emergent aquatic community sites should be researched.

Western Coulee and Ridges

Development on ridges above rivers can alter shoreline habitat and increase erosion. Rip-rapping, levees, seawalls, and dikes have been constructed (these have some positive effects in protecting marshes behind dikes). Invasive plants (e.g., reed canary grass, purple loosestrife) can replace native plants. Invasive animals (e.g., common carp) are also a problem for this community type. An astounding abundance of dams in this Ecological Landscape raised water levels to eliminate this community type in some sites, but created marsh habitat in other locations. Dams also change timing and duration of water level fluctuations. Barge traffic on the Mississippi requires dredging and disposal of materials, which stirs up bottom sediments, and results in wave impacts. Past drainage for agricultural uses, and filling for roads, railroads, and industrial sites, reduced marsh habitat. Competing economic interests limit opportunities for this type in the Ecological Landscape, especially in the Mississippi River valley. The Mississippi River corridor is of continental importance to migratory waterfowl. This community is found primarily in the backwaters of large rivers (e.g., Mississippi (Grant, Crawford, Pepin, Pierce, Trempealeau Counties), Chippewa (Pepin and Buffalo Counties), Wisconsin (Crawford and Grant Counties), and Black Rivers (LaCrosse County)). Emergent marsh should be managed as a complex with floodplain forest, submergent marsh, wet meadow, shrub-carr, and adjoining uplands. Advocating for river flow management and other actions that are more beneficial to emergent plant communities, fish and wildlife should be continued. The Chippewa River Bottoms (Buffalo County) and the Trempealeau Delta (Trempealeau County) are examples of healthy emergent aquatic communities.

Western Prairie

Development on hilltops above rivers can alter shoreline habitat and increase erosion. Increasing human population levels due to the expansion of the nearby Twin Cities metropolitan area has resulted in rapidly increasing development. Agricultural practices are often used too close to pothole habitat. Invasive plants (e.g., reed canary grass, purple loosestrife) can replace native plants. Invasive animals (e.g., carp) are also a problem for this community type. Raising baitfish in potholes is a threat. There are few dams in this Ecological Landscape, but some large ones exist on the Willow and Apple Rivers, and may have raised water levels to eliminate this community type in some sites and create marsh habitat in other locations. Dams also change the timing and duration of fluctuations in water levels. Past drainage for agricultural use reduced marsh habitat. Past filling for roads and railroads has impacted the community type by altering hydrology. This community is found in this Ecological Landscape primarily in pothole lakes and also on backwaters of the St Croix River (Pierce County). Historically, this Ecological Landscape was the only part of the state where prairie potholes were found. Emergent pothole vegetation has dwindled in remaining potholes; the few remaining sites should be preserved and managed as a complex with other grassland or prairie communities, and floodplain forests along the St. Croix River. Incentives should be provided to buffer potholes with prairie or grassland to protect the emergent aquatic community. Detrimental recreational activities on the St. Croix River should be excluded by such means as creating no-wake zones near sensitive marsh habitat. Uplands should be buffered and shorelines should be managed to prevent erosion and sedimentation, and limit pollutant inputs. Shorelines should be restored where possible. Introduction of baitfish into potholes, which disrupts amphibian, invertebrate, and other components of these communities, should be controlled. The St. Croix Islands Wildlife Area (St. Croix County) remains a high quality example of this community.

Photos


Emergent Marsh Photos

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh along the eastern shore of Evergreen Lake, Sawyer County.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Monotypic cattail dominated emergent marsh, bordered by stands of the invasive exotic common reed (Phragmites australis). Pheasnat Branch Marsh, Dane County.

Photo by Andrew Galvin.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Catail-dominated emergent marsh that is part of the freshwater estuary along the Lost Creek. A hardwood swamp lies beyond the marsh. Lost Creek State Natural Area, Bayfield County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Open emergent marsh along Green Bay, showing vegetation zonation relative to differing water levels. Little Tail Point, Brown County. 2001.

Photo by Andy Clark.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh along the Pokegama River. Douglas County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Marshes below Oliver, Wisconsin. With Sparganium, Sagittaria. Douglas County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent aquatic area along Low Wolf River. Outagamie County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent aquatic marsh islands, mostly with Phragmites australis. Winnebago County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Vast emergent aquatic marshes bordering the Lower Wolf River, Winnebago County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent aquatic area along Lower Rat River. Winnebago County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent aquatic marshes along Lower Wolf River. Winnebago County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent aquatic, Waupaca County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Wet portion of meadow with emergents. Marquette County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Alkaline Emergent Marsh, Washington Island, Door County.

Photo by Emmet Judziewicz.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Scirpus fluviatilis marsh in slough of Wolf River. Outagamie County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Floating-leaved emergent aquatic marsh. Hook Lake Bog State Natural Area, Dane County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent Marsh, Trempeleau County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh, Trempeleau County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

This large marsh complex is dominated by American lotus-lily. Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge, Trempealeau County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Extensive marsh, Douglas County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh along Mississippi River backwaters, Grant County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Extensive emergent marsh near Brady's Bluff State Natural Area.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Extensive marsh dominated by American lotus-lily occurs in the Mississippi River Backwaters at Bertom Lake. Grant County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh full of Sagittaria latifolia, St. Louis River Marsh, Douglas County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Extensive Emergent Marsh within Great Lakes estuary complex. This site is now part of a National Estuarine Research Reserve (NOAA). St. Louis River, Douglas County.

Photo by Eric Epstein.

Emergent Marsh Photo

Emergent marsh. Fish Creek Slough, Bayfield County.

Photo by William E. Tans.

Note: photos are provided to illustrate various examples of natural community types. A single photograph cannot represent the range of variability inherent in a given community type. Some of these photos explicitly illustrate unusual and distinctive community variants. The community photo galleries are a work in progress that we will expand and improve in the future.

Last revised: Monday, November 14, 2016