| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/ Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/ Investment/ Voluntary
Approaches |
Education/ Communication |
Research/ Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/ Coordination |
Other |
| Quality Issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. Groundwater Quality;
Is Current Law Working? |
Should the 1984 Groundwater
Law be revisited? |
Establish different model for
regulatory program |
Provide grant money to communities
to implement DNR and/or EPA rules |
Provide more educational information
on water quality for private water supplies |
Collect more toxicological data
for health advisories |
Coordinate with municipal water
suppliers in setting and implementing new water quality standards |
|
| Groundwater standards - How
well are they working? |
Is the groundwater law already
slowly being chipped away? (e.g., by Aquifer Storage and Recovery
(ASR), natural attenuation) |
Set Enforcement Standard where
it provides a warning system |
Recognize economic impacts of
adopting groundwater standards |
|
Establish inventories of chemical
use to determine priorities for monitoring |
|
|
| |
Clarify policy for applying
a regulation in non-traditional sites (e.g. point of standards application
for Milwaukee Deep Tunnels) |
Require additional standards
for well construction to protect water quality |
|
|
Correlate toxicity levels to
detection ranges for contaminants (what levels are necessary to protect
human and aquatic health at reasonable cost) |
|
|
| |
Balance sound policy (science-based)
with public perception (e.g. low detection levels that are possible
now mean higher frequency of detection but not necessarily more contamination) |
Enforce requirement that all
agencies are to adopt groundwater standards for programs |
|
|
Research innovative well construction
methods for certain contaminants (e.g. arsenic and nitrates) |
|
|
| |
Recognize time lags between
improvements in water resources and implementation of changed management
practices |
Evaluate implications of using
public drinking water standards or groundwater standards as defacto
private drinking water standards. |
|
|
Research on alternatives to
chlorides in industry and water treatment |
|
|
| |
Examine and improve security
for groundwater supplies |
Address inconsistencies between
federal drinking water standards and state NR 140 groundwater standards |
|
|
Need a better understanding
of geochemical processes |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| B. "How Clean is Clean?" |
How clean does groundwater need
to be? |
Establish better standards for
clean up (remediation) sites |
Seek better ways to fund clean
up efforts (or make more affordable) |
Use Clean-up Strategies success
stories in educational efforts |
Assess what is successful (clean
up strategies, natural attenuation). |
Need better coordination between
DNR groundwater and remediation staff in closing contaminated sites |
|
| Remediation and clean-up
issues |
Should the issue of aquifer
classification be revisited? |
Address issue of persistent
contaminants (e.g. DNAPLs) |
Evaluate whether clean up of
organics can be done cost effectively |
Communicate: Groundwater standards
work well now. |
Evaluate clean up strategies.
Are sites being cleaned up? Is groundwater quality improving? |
|
|
| |
Consider some degradation of
the resource to solve other environmental problems. |
Address long term maintenance
of protection systems (e.g. landfill liners) |
Use PECFA fund to clean up sites
rather than engineering studies (better use of money) |
Communicate: Remediation takes
a long time |
|
|
|
| |
Recognize time lags between
improvements in water resources and implementation of changed management
practices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| C. "Chemical Soup Syndrome" |
Synergistic & cumulative
effects of pollutants are not adequately considered by current laws |
Revisit the synergistic effects
of contaminants when setting standards |
|
|
Look at cumulative effects of
contaminants on human health and other organisms |
Address management of cumulative
effects across agency lines (because each agency sets their own approach). |
|
| Multiple and cumulative effects |
Recognize difficulty in developing
a management strategy across contaminant types. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| D. Emerging Contaminants |
Find solutions to arsenic contamination
problems |
Need groundwater standards for
pharmaceuticals |
Provide assistance to small
communities to meet arsenic and radium standards |
Communicate relative risks of
different contaminants (e.g. arsenic compared to benzene). |
Identify existing data, perform
statewide surveys on pharmaceuticals, pathogens, and natural contaminants |
|
|
| Total dissolved solids (TDS),
radionuclides, arsenic |
Address natural radioactivity
in groundwater |
Regulate disposal of water/wastewater
sludge contaminated by arsenic and radioactivity |
|
Compare risk between manmade
and naturally-occurring contaminants |
Research cause of increased
radioactivity in the deep aquifer in SE Wisconsin |
|
|
| Pharmaceuticals and endocrine
disrupters |
"Is it the State’s job to protect
people from natural contaminants?" |
Enact regulations to prevent
"new" contaminants from being introduced into the water supply. |
|
|
Research on "new" contaminants
and preventing "new" contaminants from reaching the water supply/groundwater. |
|
|
| |
Address nuisance microorganisms
like iron and sulfur bacteria |
Ensure that new standards or
rules are supported by toxicological data |
|
|
Need ability to detect/quantify
emerging contaminants and medical conditions related to drinking water
quality (e.g. many people in an area with same illness) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| E. Agricultural Impacts |
How to balance current food
policies (inexpensive food/profit on volume) with groundwater protection? |
Should nitrate in groundwater
be regulated? e.g. restrictions on private wells |
Encourage more farmers to adopt
N management |
Provide more information to
farmers about N crediting |
Identify and track constituents
contributing to nonpoint source pollution (N and P) |
|
|
| (Nonpoint sources, pesticides,
and fertilizers) |
Develop nitrate policy; address
nitrate contamination issues |
Enact & enforce "laws with
teeth" |
Require non-potato crop in affected
areas |
Promote public health and education
for rural residents |
Develop methods to determine
source of N contamination |
|
|
| |
Make use of pesticide use/impacts
database |
Address nitrate exemptions in
current codes |
Provide cost-sharing for reducing
nitrate levels |
Recognize that nitrate contamination
is not universally viewed as a problem - perhaps related to its ubiquity |
Identify technology solutions
for reducing nitrate pollution |
|
|
| |
|
Clarify who has authority to
regulate nitrate |
Find relatively easy solutions
such as composting potato vines to reduce N leaching. |
Promote the proper use of fertilizers
and pesticides |
Monitor quality of rural water
every 5 years. |
|
|
| |
|
Evaluate implications of Food
Quality Protection Act on groundwater regulations |
Provide incentives for crop
rotations to decrease nitrate levels in groundwater. |
|
Evaluate nitrogen and phosphorus
application rates - are they too high? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Evaluate impact of nitrate in
groundwater on aquatic ecosystems. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Evaluate leaching over whole
rotation not just one crop. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| F. Wastewater Treatment
and Land Application |
Does COMM 83 (onsite wastewater
treatment system code) allow too much contamination? |
Enforce existing standards and
other laws (holding tank pumping) |
Provide direction on "economic
and technical feasibility exemptions" with regard to NR140 standards
as applied to wastewater disposal. |
|
Research on the effect of anti-bacterial
soaps on septic systems |
|
|
| |
Address inadequate protection
of sensitive areas (example Door Co.) |
Set effluent limitations for
point source discharges to disappearing streams and other karst features |
|
|
Develop a better understanding
of microbial pathogens |
|
|
| |
Does land-applied wastewater
result in pathogens finding way into groundwater? |
|
|
|
Perform more frequent testing
of private wells for bacteria and nitrate |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| G. Wellhead Protection
and Source Water Assessment |
Encourage protection of groundwater
recharge areas |
Expand power of municipalities
to protect Source Water Protection Areas |
|
|
|
Address issue of overlapping
jurisdictions with regard to drinking water protection |
|
| |
Address the loss of undeveloped
land which has attenuative properties |
Require regular inspection of
wellhead protection/source water areas |
|
|
|
Explore ways to protect water
supply when wellhead protection areas extend outside city limits |
|
| |
|
Implement local to regional
well prohibitions in bad water quality areas |
|
|
|
Make sure planning commissions
are aware of Source Water Assessment program designation of local
"problem" areas |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| Quantity Issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H. Groundwater Quantity
- General |
Determine goals of "quantity
strategy" (e.g. restoration of water level and baseflow) |
Is legislative or political
process ready to deal with quantity regulations? |
Assess where money come from
to pay for changes |
Target education for Legislators |
Base groundwater quantity strategy
on best available science |
Explore collaborative approaches
between industry and government |
Recognize that locals lack implementation
structure for managing water quantity |
| Is there a need for statewide
groundwater strategy? |
Is there consensus on the need
to change, or can it be reached? |
Develop laws to address water
quantity issues in Wisconsin |
Establish funding mechanism
for groundwater quantity management |
Educate public to understand
concepts involved and to minimize emotional aspects of issue (e.g.
water use by Perrier vs. some farming operations vs. beer production) |
Check laws/regulations in other
states (Calif., Florida, western states) to see what has and hasn't
worked |
Use data and groundwater flow
models to predict trends, communicate with community leaders, planners,
regulators, citizens |
Recognize that groundwater levels
have risen in some areas (e.g., parts of Dane Co.) |
| |
Assess whether water quantity
should be addressed comprehensively or case by case |
Assess whether opening up the
groundwater law to add quantity would weaken it |
Promote incentives and cooperation
efforts, not command and control |
Provide continuing education
for professionals and industries using water |
Determine how mining of resource
diminishes supply |
Compare local solutions to groundwater
quantity problems vs. regional solutions. |
Address population growth in
water-short areas |
| |
Need for "multifaceted" approach
- planning, education, laws, research, etc. in dealing with groundwater
quantity problems |
Establish Preventive Action
Limit (PAL) process for water quantity. |
Acknowledge economic advantages
to those who do nothing if others take action (e.g., to move to surface
water sources) |
Develop technical education
program and take around state to local officials. Emphasize benefits
of action - not all bad news. |
Research other states/nations
solutions to groundwater quantity problems, including jurisdiction
and legal issues |
Focus water quantity efforts
in areas where groundwater is being depleted. |
Seek trust and cooperation
among all the parties to solve quantity problems |
| |
Should water quantity policies
be applied to the entire aquifer or only recharge areas? |
Reorganize DNR along groundwater
aquifer boundaries |
|
Improve public's understanding
of connection between groundwater use and groundwater recharge |
Collect data on water use, exportation,
and wastewater discharges |
Address issues on a comprehensive
basis rather than case by case |
Set clear goals for quantity
strategy |
| |
Add quantity issue to the quality
strategy being used statewide. |
Strengthen water use reporting
process to provide evidence for action |
|
|
Develop statewide groundwater
flow models; build on existing local and regional ones |
Need for "joint management"
in areas with groundwater quantity problems |
|
| |
Need to prioritize limited groundwater
resources |
|
|
|
Check public sentiment regarding
how much groundwater withdrawal they are willing to tolerate |
Make use of regional planning
commissions and Smart Growth laws to address quantity management |
|
| |
Develop a mechanism/ strategy
to avoid western US style water wars |
|
|
|
Define what a groundwater quantity
problem is. |
Need for flexible approach to
deal w/groundwater quantity problems - needs to be able to work at
different levels: local, regional, state, national, international;
within "problemshed" |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| I. Competing Water Uses
& Water Supply Needs |
Need more protection of private
wells from pumping by municipal wells |
Set targets for water use dependent
on industry . |
|
Provide education on groundwater
principles - dispel the safe yield myth. |
Need data on current water use |
Use regional approach to water
use |
Need for dispute resolution
for competing groundwater users |
| |
Assess different requirements
for siting new wells vs. replacing existing ones |
Allocate water based on "best
use" - but who will decide? |
|
Improve public awareness of
the impact of water use |
Determine where water supply
problems exist and where they do not |
Prioritize among the competing
demands for water |
Evaluate use of treated water
"Should we fight fires with potable water?" |
| |
Develop a comprehensive groundwater
use strategy. |
Develop rules to determine how
to balance the competing water needs given the scarce resources |
|
|
Require all users to report
water use as municipalities currently do |
Base water use on "first come,
first serve" or equal sharing? |
|
| |
Define "consumptive use" relative
to economic development. |
Create legal mechanism to prohibit
extraction of groundwater for private water supplies in areas with
a public water supply system |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| J. Water Conservation |
Promote water conservation (the
need to use less water & use water more wisely) |
Enact legislation to require
water conservation |
Change municipal water pricing
policies to encourage conservation |
Proactive education on water
conservation. |
Gather information about and
make use of successful water conservation strategies |
Target areas for water conservation
(e.g. urban areas) |
|
| Individual homes, businesses,
communities. |
Balance use vs. conservation
in a working landscape. |
Freeze (water use) levels at
today's numbers. |
Provide tax incentives to large
water users to encourage conservation |
Target hospitality industry
(hotels, restaurants, etc.) |
Measure impact conservation
messages are having. |
Ensure internal consistency
of agencies and conservation policy with respect to economic development
vs. water use. |
|
| |
Foster leadership on conservation
issues |
Enforce conservation policy
on the books. |
Use water bills/cost to encourage
water conservation at residential level |
Involve local Health Department
in helping users learn to conserve. |
Determine benefits and limits
of water conservation (highest and lowest attainable). |
|
|
| |
Need for changes in public water
use to conserve water |
Enact regulation of industry
to ensure they are not wasting water |
Make more funds available for
water conservation efforts |
Increase education/ awareness
of use and ways to conserve (especially important during "drought"
periods) |
Collect information on high
rate use of water (like lawn watering & other practices) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| K. High Capacity Wells |
How to prioritize water withdrawal? |
Create legal tools to regulate
high capacity pumping (e.g. farm, resort wells) |
It can be expensive to show
no impact - can municipalities afford it? |
|
Develop a standard to define
no adverse impact |
|
|
| Location/permitting of hi-cap
wells |
Recognize that only a handful
of well applications each year potentially have an adverse impact |
Create legislation to regulate
groundwater quantity (high capacity well law without exemptions) |
Establish fee structure per
volume used as part of permitting for high cap wells |
|
Collect data on amount of water
being pumped from high capacity wells. |
|
|
| |
Should the burden be on new
water users to show no adverse impact? |
Clarify DNR policy on high-cap
wells (relationship to quantity issues) |
|
|
Need to understand the impact
of high capacity wells on biological resources |
|
|
| |
Look beyond capacity problems
created by individual high-capacity permit seekers. |
Regulate the maximum amount
of groundwater that may be pumped |
|
|
Perform site evaluations on
high-cap wells. |
|
|
| |
Recognize that different users
have different impacts (e.g., one may discharge to a stream another
loses water as steam) |
Limit number of irrigation wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Evaluate agricultural practices
(Overproduction of vegetables?). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| L. Water Rate Structures
and Pricing |
Change municipal water pricing
policies to encourage conservation |
Set rate structures on statewide
water conservation policy/legislation |
Alter PSC rate structures to
promote less use, but should not be uniform statewide |
Educate PSC and staff to appreciate
the need to address water quantity issues. |
Research on commodification
of water where appropriate |
Form transition plan for implementing
new rate structures. |
|
| |
Reevaluate Public Service Commission
(PSC) rates - (currently "Use More Pay Less" mentality). |
Distinguish between "Newcomers"
(who benefit from excess capacity of the water supply system) and
"Long Time Users" in setting rates (e.g. Newcomers could pay a special
"user fee" in order for municipality to recuperate initial investment
and pass savings onto long-time users) |
Evaluate possible fee sources-
new users, new wells, abandonment fees |
|
Measure: Who will be affected
by price structure changes and how? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| M. Groundwater Recharge |
Use regional or watershed approach
to address problems with regional groundwater recharge |
Address loss of groundwater
recharge areas in the state |
|
Improve public's understanding
of connection between groundwater use and groundwater recharge |
Study impacts of using urban
runoff to increase groundwater recharge |
|
|
| |
Encourage protection of groundwater
recharge areas |
|
|
|
Research on recharge area needs
to preserve stream baseflow |
|
|
| |
Develop a process for protection
of headwater areas |
|
|
|
Research on recharge strategies
in deficient areas, other than rebound by not pumping |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| N. Great Lakes Withdrawal/
Interbasin Transfers |
Prevent loss of Great Lakes
water through diversion |
Evaluate how International Law/Agreements
may supersede State or Local laws in regards to water withdrawals |
|
|
Determine statewide groundwater
budget (current in-state use vs. out-of-state use and likely future
trends) |
|
|
| |
Prevent loss of groundwater
sent out of state |
Interbasin water transfer: restriction,
prohibition or mitigation? |
|
|
Investigate impacts of water
exportation. |
|
|
| |
Use standard Great Lakes withdrawal
process for other areas |
Make sure our laws protect groundwater
from being sold as a commodity |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| O. Efficiency of Water
Systems |
Fix leaks (in distribution system
and/or homes) to reduce losses and improve efficiency |
Set targets to reduce leaks. |
Develop a process to provide
incentives for leak repairs (similar to those used in agriculture) |
Target municipalities, users,
commercial/industrial/private |
Measure the relative contributions
to cumulative leaks (e.g. water main leaks vs. leaks at the house/building;
water main breaks, cleaning). |
Involve local water utility
to help identify problems in losing water. |
|
| |
|
Measure cumulative leaks with
pumping and metered numbers. |
|
Messages: Worthwhile economically
and environmentally. |
Find out if somebody has already
done this research (WCWA/AWWA) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Measure success - did the message
inform the audience/move them to action? |
Investigate technology of how
to fix the leaks. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| Quality and Quantity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| P. Groundwater Management
(Quality and Quantity) |
Recognize differing needs of
humans and environment in terms of groundwater protection |
Integrate groundwater quantity
and quality management within one agency (DNR) |
Need more funding (at all levels)
to deal with both water quality and quantity issues in Wisconsin |
Improve understanding of groundwater
systems |
Characterize the quality and
quantity concerns for Wisconsin's groundwater. |
Political boundaries impede
collaboration in groundwater. |
|
| |
Develop a process to deal with
expected and unexpected groundwater quality and quantity issues. |
Apply regulations and standards
consistently among agencies responsible for groundwater protection. |
Seek creative sources of additional
revenue for groundwater management (e.g., Groundwater Guardian to
pay for well filling and sealing) |
Improve general public's understanding
of groundwater encourage better decision making |
Improve understanding of groundwater
flow, travel/lag times |
Examine administration of groundwater
regulation and coordination among agencies |
|
| |
Avoid basing policy on just
one issue only, it must be comprehensive |
Explore ways to resolve intergovernmental
conflicts over groundwater issues statutorily |
Consider the economic impacts
of groundwater management actions |
Improve method of providing
private well owners and drillers with information regarding water
quality and quantity. |
Determine value of groundwater
resource relative to economic value of use - limits? |
Work at state, national and
international levels for coordination of groundwater protection and
use. |
|
| |
Invoke the precautionary principle
when data is not available |
Address historical and cultural
significance in DNR regulations (tribal considerations). |
Promote "Cooperative Compliance"
- working with regulated community to make informed economic decisions
based on science. |
Use groundwater models and water
budgets as an effective educational tool |
|
|
|
| |
Consider equity in quality and
quantity issues |
Clarify who should bear the
burden of proof as to whether an activity causes harm to groundwater
resource |
|
Target education for local politicians
and Legislators (seminars, informational packets) |
|
|
|
| |
Determine if it's better to
increase groundwater quality at the expense of quantity or vice versa |
Enforce current codes. |
|
Promote groundwater education
through electronic media (e.g. "Into the Outdoors" TV program) |
|
|
|
| |
Recognize long-term nature of
issues - areas not experiencing problems today may have problems tomorrow |
Build enforcement into new laws |
|
Educate community leaders first
regarding groundwater problems and possible solutions |
|
|
|
| |
Consider how groundwater protection
is prioritized among other policy and financial needs |
|
|
Educate the public about groundwater
as a working resource - used by industry, public water systems, agriculture,
etc. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| Q. Impacts of Withdrawals
on Quality |
Evaluate whether over-pumping
may cause irreversible changes to water quality |
|
Optimize pumping to reduce TDS
and radioactivity in groundwater |
|
Study geochemical changes (hydraulic
connection and mixing between aquifer units) as result of major cones
of depression statewide |
Explore use of small cluster
wells to provide communities with water rather than deep wells with
poor water quality |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Need more study on impacts of
mining withdrawals |
Balance quality needs vs. quantity
needs. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| R. Groundwater/ Surface
Water Interactions |
Manage groundwater and surface
water together (DNR structural changes?) |
Include interconnectedness of
surface water and groundwater in groundwater law (purpose section). |
Consider cost of moving wells
to preserve quantity for streams, springs. |
Draw connections between groundwater
quantity issues and ecological effects. |
Increase funding for research
on groundwater/ surface water interactions |
|
|
| Impacts of withdrawals on
surface waters |
Use surface water to take pressure
off aquifers |
Establish regulations to protect
wetlands and wildlife habitat from groundwater withdrawals |
|
Demonstrate interrelated nature
of surface and groundwater |
Develop ways to estimate the
quantity of water that can be withdrawn without impacts on environment |
|
|
| |
How can society's water needs
be met without adverse impacts on surface waters that provide quality
of life? |
|
|
|
Research on aquatic habitat
issues - groundwater inputs to cold water trout streams |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Research how infiltration prevents
thermal contamination of surface water |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| S. Land Use and Development |
Address conflict between new
development and protection of recharge areas and water quality |
Require permits for private
well installation as part of land use planning |
Promote use of "conservation"
subdivisions (clustered homes w/greenspace between clusters) |
Use "lack of planning" case
studies as educational tools |
Develop tools to help local
communities protect their water supplies via Smart Growth |
Take advantage of the opportunity
provided by Smart Growth to address groundwater protection |
|
| Smart Growth |
Address water supply needs and
availability as part of economic and land development (often overlooked) |
Consider community growth restrictions
to protect groundwater (example Boulder, CO green belt) - although
this could contribute to increased urban sprawl |
Create incentives for compliance
with (advisory) land use plans |
Educate local planning committees
and water utilities about water supply provisions of Smart Growth
plans |
Require hydrology (groundwater
& surface water) studies of impacts of new development |
Recognize limits to Smart Growth
planning (limited to local areas; incompatibility of plans in dealing
with regional problems; differing regulations along jurisdictional
borders; "long" time (10 yr) for implementation) |
|
| |
Recognize that land use patterns
must change if start using shallow aquifers for water supply |
Create legal mechanism to prohibit
extraction of groundwater for private water supplies in areas where
development density is high |
|
|
Document the effects of urban
sprawl and rural development on groundwater |
Make compliance with land use
plans compulsory |
|
| |
Reduce runoff and soil erosion.
Soil conservation practices will address quality and quantity issues. |
Require a public water supply
system for intense development (certain threshold)- make this a condition
of new development |
|
|
Research on the loss of groundwater
recharge areas in the state |
Give planning commissions authority
over sewer extensions |
|
| |
Address the loss of undeveloped
land which has attenuative properties |
Adopt zoning to protect land
from development, urban sprawl and highway related contamination |
|
|
|
Minimize unsound land use such
as subdivisions outside city service areas. |
|
| |
Improve forestry practices to
address quality and quantity issues (e.g. trees spaced out or preventing
removal from watersheds). |
Ensure legislation is fair to
developers |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Achieve balance between land
use for farming or preservation and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| T. Aquifer Storage and
Recovery (ASR) |
Consider using ASR to balance
seasonal variation in surface water resources. |
Should injection well prohibition
be sustained? |
|
|
Need ASR studies, legal and
geochemical implications |
|
|
| |
Aquifer storage may improve
quantity but compromise quality. |
|
|
|
Need more research on ASR before
it should be allowed in WI |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| U. Water Reuse and Recycling |
Use recycled wastewater to recharge
groundwater for both domestic and community use. |
Review wastewater disposal and
treatment rules to allow for recycling |
Encourage use of recycled water
with incentives |
|
Compile best management practices
for companies practicing re-use of recycled water. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Issue
Category |
Policy/Concepts |
Regulatory/
Legislative Approaches |
Incentives/
Investment/ Voluntary Approaches |
Education/
Communication |
Research/
Monitoring/ Data Collection |
Planning/
Coordination |
Other |
| Other |
|
|